Providence Community Church  ·  Lenexa

Reading Revelation

Five skills, and how to practise them
Skill Five

The Diverse Excellencies

Skill Two taught you to take a symbol apart. It never told you why the book was built out of symbols in the first place. That is this one, and it is the answer the whole guide has been walking toward: Revelation compresses because its subject will not fit in a sentence.

Some of what follows you have already done — the Christ of chapter 1 and the Lamb of chapter 5 were both on your table in Skill Two. Go back and read what you wrote then, or come at them fresh. Either is fine. You are asking a different question this time, and you may find your old answers were better than you remember, or thinner.

Movement One

Read Edwards first

Before any of the passages, sit with this

In 1738 Jonathan Edwards preached a sermon called The Excellency of Christ. His text was Revelation 5:5–6 — the Lion announced and the Lamb shown — and his doctrine was one sentence: there is an admirable conjunction of diverse excellencies in Jesus Christ. It has been a favourite here for years. Read it slowly; it is short.

The reading

John was informed about a lion which had managed to open the book, and likely anticipated seeing a lion in his vision. But as he was expecting to see one, there appeared a lamb to open the book — a creature entirely unlike a lion. A lion is a predator, one accustomed to causing dreadful slaughter among other animals, and no creature is more easily caught as prey by it than a lamb.

Jesus Christ possesses a most admirable union of various excellencies. Although the lion and the lamb are very different kinds of animals, each of them has its own particular merits. The lion is superior in strength and in the dignity of his look and voice, while the lamb is outstanding in meekness and patience. Yet we find in the text that Christ is compared with both of them, where the distinct excellencies of each are wonderfully brought together in him.

Jonathan Edwards, The Excellency of Christ — modernised

The pairs

Edwards then goes through the excellencies that meet in Christ two at a time. Each pair is a genuine collision: hold either one alone and you have a figure you could describe. Hold both and you have someone you have to be shown.

infinite highness
and
infinite condescension
infinite justice
and
infinite grace
infinite glory
and
lowest humility
infinite majesty
and
transcendent meekness
deepest reverence toward God
and
equality with God
absolute sovereignty
and
perfect resignation
self‑sufficiency
and
complete trust

Edwards’s own list runs longer than this. These are the seven we keep coming back to.

Take one pair

Not all seven. One. Choose the pair you find hardest to hold together — the one where you suspect that believing the left half properly would cost you the right half.

Write about that. Where do you quietly keep only one of the two? Most of us have a Christ who is running at half strength in one direction, and we did not choose it on purpose.

One pair, and be honest about which half you drop
Movement Two

Why a symbol, then

The argument this whole guide has been building toward

Here is the problem Edwards is describing, put in terms of language. A sentence has to choose. You can say he is strong. You can say he is meek. You cannot say both in one predicate, and if you say them one after another they start negotiating with each other — the listener hears a qualification, and quietly downgrades both. Fairly strong. Fairly meek. A reasonable man.

An image does not negotiate. Put the Lion and the Lamb in a single sentence of vision and neither one is reduced by the other. The lion is not slightly less a lion for standing next to a lamb. Both run at full strength at once, and the collision between them is not a problem in the text — the collision is the text.

Which answers a question you were left holding at the end of Skill Two: why does John describe Jesus almost entirely in borrowed words, instead of telling us plainly what he saw? Because plainly was not available. What he was given to say does not go into propositions without losing most of itself, and he had a form that could carry it whole.

So — the finding

Compression is not concealment. It is capacity.

Which changes what decompressing a symbol is for. You are not cracking a code and you are not solving a puzzle. You are opening something up to find out how much was packed into it — and what was packed into it, every time, is him.

Write that finding in your own words before you go on
Movement Three

The Christological passages

Eleven places the collision happens — one a sitting

These are not for looking up. You have done the lookup work. This is meditation: read the text, see the two things that will not go together, and stay there until it stops being a puzzle and starts being a person. The prompt at the bottom of each is a place to rest, not a question to answer well.

Do not do these in one sitting. There are eleven, and one at a time is the whole point.

Revelation 1:5–6

Ruler of kings, and the one who loves us

… the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood…
Dominion and affection, laid end to end with no transition between them. John does not feel the need to explain how the ruler of the kings of the earth is also the one who loves you.
Read it again and put the stress on us. Whose blood, and for whom?
Revelation 1:13–18

The hair of the Ancient of Days, on someone who died

The hairs of his head were white, like white wool… and his face was like the sun shining in full strength. When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. But he laid his right hand on me, saying, “Fear not… I died, and behold I am alive forevermore.”
You worked this one in Skill Two, so you know where the hair comes from. Sit with what it means that the same figure says I died. Eternity itself, with a death in its past.
Notice which hand does which. The hand that put him on the floor is the hand that steadies him. Stay there a while.
Revelation 2:18–21

Eyes like fire, and a clock run slow

The words of the Son of God, who has eyes like a flame of fire, and whose feet are like burnished bronze… I gave her time to repent.
Eyes that miss nothing, and then a delay granted on purpose to someone who is using it badly. Sight and patience, in the same paragraph, aimed at the same woman.
Where has his patience with you looked, from the inside, like his not noticing?
Revelation 3:14–20

The beginning of creation, waiting at a door

The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God’s creation… Behold, I stand at the door and knock.
The one through whom everything started, standing outside a door he does not open himself. And he says it to the church with the least to recommend it.
He knocks rather than enters. Do not resolve that too quickly.
Revelation 5:5–6

The Lion and the Lamb

“Behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah… has conquered.” And I saw a Lamb standing, as though it had been slain, with seven horns and with seven eyes.
The hinge of the whole book, and the text Edwards preached. Announced as one animal, shown as its natural prey. And then look at the horns — seven of them, full strength, growing out of something killed.
You met this in Skill Two and answered a question about the word conquered. Go find what you wrote. Would you still write it?
Revelation 7:17

A lamb who shepherds

For the Lamb in the midst of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of living water, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.
A sheep tending sheep. And a throne in the same sentence as a hand wiping a face — the largest thing in the room and the smallest gesture in it.
Whose tears. Name them, if you can.
Revelation 12:5, 11

A rod of iron, and a way of winning

She gave birth to a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron… And they have conquered him by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, for they loved not their lives even unto death.
The iron rod is real. So is the method — and the method is dying. Two verses apart, and the second one explains what the first one meant all along.
Chapter 12 says the accuser is thrown down. By what.
Revelation 19:11–16

Every name published, and one held back

… called Faithful and True… He has a name written that no one knows but himself… On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords.
In four verses he is given more names than anyone in Scripture — and in the middle of them, a name nobody gets. Fully disclosed and not exhaustible, at the same time.
There is something about him you will not be given. Is that a loss?
Revelation 19:7, 9

The slain animal throws the wedding

“Let us rejoice and exult and give him the glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and his Bride has made herself ready”… “Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.”
He is still called the Lamb here. The sacrifice is the bridegroom, and the supper is in his honour rather than at his expense.
The title he keeps at his own wedding is the one he got by dying.
Revelation 21:22–23

The temple, and the lamp

And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb. And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and its lamp is the Lamb.
The place where sacrifice happened has been replaced by the sacrifice. And then the same figure is a lamp — something small enough to carry, lighting a city with no need of a sun.
No temple. Sit with the absence before you go to the reason for it.
Revelation 22:13, 16

His own ancestor

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end… I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.
Root and descendant. He is the source of the man he is descended from — and this is his own last self‑description in the book, the note he chooses to end on.
Of everything he could have said last, he said this. Why this?
The end of it

The thing which should not be

What all the reading was for

Every one of those eleven is a thing which should not be:

A resurrected body. A tender‑hearted king. A courageous servant. None of them should exist, and the one who holds all of them together is the reason this book had to be written in pictures rather than propositions.

So you have five skills now. The first says the book had an address. The second says its images are compressed. The third says its comforts are real and older than the book. The fourth says those comforts were fitted to particular people in particular trouble. And the fifth says what the whole apparatus was ever for.

It was never a puzzle to be solved. It was a person to be seen — and seen at full strength in every direction at once, which is the only way anyone has ever been comforted by him.

The last thing to write

Go back through the notebook — all of it, from the first city brief to the last of these eleven. Find the place where you first stopped reading Revelation as a problem. Date it if you can. Then write down what you saw there.

The last entry, and the one to keep